<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Cufon vs sIFR vs FLIR</title> <atom:link href="http://thinkclay.com/technology/cufon-sifr-flir/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://thinkclay.com/technology/cufon-sifr-flir</link> <description>Creative Media Design, Powered by Wordpress</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 11:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: Todd Motto</title><link>http://thinkclay.com/technology/cufon-sifr-flir/comment-page-1#comment-2287</link> <dc:creator>Todd Motto</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 11:02:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://thinkclay.com/?p=827#comment-2287</guid> <description>Cufon is the best for me. Hate Flash.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cufon is the best for me. Hate Flash.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Niaw</title><link>http://thinkclay.com/technology/cufon-sifr-flir/comment-page-1#comment-2276</link> <dc:creator>Niaw</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 04:22:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://thinkclay.com/?p=827#comment-2276</guid> <description>The issue with FLIR is more on searchability than the ability to select. Converting the text to an image kills the semantics of your markup.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue with FLIR is more on searchability than the ability to select. Converting the text to an image kills the semantics of your markup.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tuukka Virtaperko</title><link>http://thinkclay.com/technology/cufon-sifr-flir/comment-page-1#comment-2248</link> <dc:creator>Tuukka Virtaperko</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://thinkclay.com/?p=827#comment-2248</guid> <description>According to this, Adobe licences, for example, are compatible with Cufón:
webfonts.info/wiki/index.php?title=Web_fonts_licensing_overview</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to this, Adobe licences, for example, are compatible with Cufón:<br
/> webfonts.info/wiki/index.php?title=Web_fonts_licensing_overview</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Aeg Zid</title><link>http://thinkclay.com/technology/cufon-sifr-flir/comment-page-1#comment-2132</link> <dc:creator>Aeg Zid</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 01:46:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://thinkclay.com/?p=827#comment-2132</guid> <description>the hover state on cufon is available now, just need to declare it in the script:  Cufon.replace(&#039;#menu_top&#039;, { fontFamily: &quot;YOUR FONT&quot;, hover: true });</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the hover state on cufon is available now, just need to declare it in the script:  Cufon.replace(&#8216;#menu_top&#8217;, { fontFamily: &#8220;YOUR FONT&#8221;, hover: true });</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thomas Phinney</title><link>http://thinkclay.com/technology/cufon-sifr-flir/comment-page-1#comment-1982</link> <dc:creator>Thomas Phinney</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 06:32:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://thinkclay.com/?p=827#comment-1982</guid> <description>&quot;Does not violate EULA or copyrights, since font is contained within the SWF object.&quot; &quot;Like it or not, and argue it as you may, Adobe Flash is legally allowed to embed and use fonts that the developer has purchased.&quot;
I would not have agreed with that statement even when I was product manager for fonts at Adobe. Using fonts in Flash (SWF objects) is just as much subject to licensing restrictions as any other use of fonts is. More font licensors are okay with it than with some uses one can think of, but it&#039;s not some sort of magical get-out-of-jail-free card to avoid licensing issues. You still need to check the EULA for the font, and see if the use you want is permitted. If it&#039;s not clear, you may need to contact the licensor.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Does not violate EULA or copyrights, since font is contained within the SWF object.&#8221; &#8220;Like it or not, and argue it as you may, Adobe Flash is legally allowed to embed and use fonts that the developer has purchased.&#8221;</p><p>I would not have agreed with that statement even when I was product manager for fonts at Adobe. Using fonts in Flash (SWF objects) is just as much subject to licensing restrictions as any other use of fonts is. More font licensors are okay with it than with some uses one can think of, but it&#8217;s not some sort of magical get-out-of-jail-free card to avoid licensing issues. You still need to check the EULA for the font, and see if the use you want is permitted. If it&#8217;s not clear, you may need to contact the licensor.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thomas Phinney</title><link>http://thinkclay.com/technology/cufon-sifr-flir/comment-page-1#comment-1981</link> <dc:creator>Thomas Phinney</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 06:26:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://thinkclay.com/?p=827#comment-1981</guid> <description>Urm, no, EOT fonts can be hinted or anti-aliased just fine. They&#039;re just TrueType fonts in a funky wrapper.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Urm, no, EOT fonts can be hinted or anti-aliased just fine. They&#8217;re just TrueType fonts in a funky wrapper.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mahijeet Singh</title><link>http://thinkclay.com/technology/cufon-sifr-flir/comment-page-1#comment-1966</link> <dc:creator>Mahijeet Singh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://thinkclay.com/?p=827#comment-1966</guid> <description>Even Google Font Directory isn&#039;t a bad option. but in the same it loads the page slowly. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even Google Font Directory isn&#8217;t a bad option. but in the same it loads the page slowly.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mahijeet Singh</title><link>http://thinkclay.com/technology/cufon-sifr-flir/comment-page-1#comment-1967</link> <dc:creator>Mahijeet Singh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://thinkclay.com/?p=827#comment-1967</guid> <description>Even Google Font Directory isn&#039;t a bad option. but in the same it loads the page slowly. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even Google Font Directory isn&#8217;t a bad option. but in the same it loads the page slowly.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mahijeet Singh</title><link>http://thinkclay.com/technology/cufon-sifr-flir/comment-page-1#comment-1968</link> <dc:creator>Mahijeet Singh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://thinkclay.com/?p=827#comment-1968</guid> <description>Even Google Font Directory isn&#039;t a bad option. but in the same it loads the page slowly. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even Google Font Directory isn&#8217;t a bad option. but in the same it loads the page slowly.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: alex petroni</title><link>http://thinkclay.com/technology/cufon-sifr-flir/comment-page-1#comment-1904</link> <dc:creator>alex petroni</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:54:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://thinkclay.com/?p=827#comment-1904</guid> <description>Very good post. Clear and to the point. Some of the comments are helpful. Thanks ! :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good post. Clear and to the point. Some of the comments are helpful. Thanks ! <img
src='http://thinkclay.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
